2009 Aug 16 23:59:09  <inimino> who's around?
2009 Aug 16 23:59:46  <inimino> aamar, mariorz?
2009 Aug 17 00:00:02  <aamar> hey, inimino
2009 Aug 17 00:00:19  <inimino> hey
2009 Aug 17 00:05:40  <aamar> wait another minute or two?
2009 Aug 17 00:06:36  <inimino> ok, sure
2009 Aug 17 00:20:02  <aamar> let's start
2009 Aug 17 00:20:03  <aamar> ?
2009 Aug 17 00:20:16  <inimino> ok, sure
2009 Aug 17 00:21:25  <inimino> I didn't quite finish 3.4, but just about
2009 Aug 17 00:21:33  <aamar> 3.38 ?
2009 Aug 17 00:21:52  <aamar> http://pasternak.superalloy.nl/pastes/2624
2009 Aug 17 00:22:02  <inimino> http://inimino.org/~inimino/projects/2009/SICP/chap_3/3.38
2009 Aug 17 00:22:12  <aamar> same here
2009 Aug 17 00:22:16  <aamar> almost got through it...
2009 Aug 17 00:22:42  <inimino> yeah
2009 Aug 17 00:23:19  <aamar> similar answers here...
2009 Aug 17 00:23:48  <inimino> yep, looks the same
2009 Aug 17 00:23:53  <inimino> 3.39?
2009 Aug 17 00:24:14  <inimino> http://inimino.org/~inimino/projects/2009/SICP/chap_3/3.39
2009 Aug 17 00:24:14  <aamar> yes
2009 Aug 17 00:24:22  <aamar> http://pasternak.superalloy.nl/pastes/2625
2009 Aug 17 00:24:23  <inimino> my answer is shorter than the URL ;-)
2009 Aug 17 00:24:57  <aamar> heh, same answers
2009 Aug 17 00:24:58  <inimino> same again
2009 Aug 17 00:25:09  <inimino> 3.40?
2009 Aug 17 00:25:16  <aamar> http://pasternak.superalloy.nl/pastes/2626
2009 Aug 17 00:25:26  <inimino> http://inimino.org/~inimino/projects/2009/SICP/chap_3/3.40
2009 Aug 17 00:25:50  <aamar> github is great, but seems they're having scaling troubles lately
2009 Aug 17 00:26:15  <inimino> oh
2009 Aug 17 00:26:28  <inimino> I've never used github
2009 Aug 17 00:26:35  <inimino> looks like the same answer again
2009 Aug 17 00:27:21  <aamar> yes, different notation, same answer
2009 Aug 17 00:27:31  <inimino> yes
2009 Aug 17 00:27:39  <inimino> 3.41?
2009 Aug 17 00:27:45  <aamar> ok
2009 Aug 17 00:27:49  <aamar> 3.41: ; Do not agree, access to the bank balance is already 'atomic' and can't on its own cause anomalous behavior.
2009 Aug 17 00:27:59  <inimino> http://inimino.org/~inimino/projects/2009/SICP/chap_3/3.41
2009 Aug 17 00:28:26  <inimino> yep, our answers agree here too
2009 Aug 17 00:28:48  <aamar> ok
2009 Aug 17 00:28:54  <inimino> 3.42?
2009 Aug 17 00:29:15  <aamar> ok
2009 Aug 17 00:29:19  <inimino> http://inimino.org/~inimino/projects/2009/SICP/chap_3/3.42
2009 Aug 17 00:29:22  <aamar> I was very unsure of the answer to this one.
2009 Aug 17 00:29:28  <aamar> http://pasternak.superalloy.nl/pastes/2627
2009 Aug 17 00:29:31  <inimino> me too
2009 Aug 17 00:29:47  <inimino> I didn't understand why they included such a long question if the answer was simply "no"
2009 Aug 17 00:30:24  <inimino> haha, we seemed to identify the same potential issue...
2009 Aug 17 00:30:45  <inimino> but later I read the implementation of serialized presented and also agree that it doesn't have that problem
2009 Aug 17 00:31:04  <inimino> I think the wording of the text and exercise was a bit confusing
2009 Aug 17 00:31:13  <aamar> Yes, I had it as "no" for a while, but I went back and decided that that's the possible error that could arise.
2009 Aug 17 00:31:51  <inimino> agreed
2009 Aug 17 00:32:02  <inimino> alright, 3.43?
2009 Aug 17 00:32:14  <aamar> ok
2009 Aug 17 00:32:30  <inimino> http://inimino.org/~inimino/projects/2009/SICP/chap_3/3.43
2009 Aug 17 00:32:33  <aamar> http://pasternak.superalloy.nl/pastes/2628
2009 Aug 17 00:34:16  <inimino> same answer except for the part that I skipped
2009 Aug 17 00:35:12  <aamar> yes, the part you skipped was basically obvious anyway
2009 Aug 17 00:35:23  <inimino> yeah
2009 Aug 17 00:35:28  <inimino> alright, 3.44?
2009 Aug 17 00:35:50  <aamar> yes, few more short ones here...
2009 Aug 17 00:35:55  <aamar> http://pasternak.superalloy.nl/pastes/2629
2009 Aug 17 00:36:02  <inimino> http://inimino.org/~inimino/projects/2009/SICP/chap_3/3.44
2009 Aug 17 00:36:44  <inimino> very similar answers again
2009 Aug 17 00:37:06  <aamar> agreed
2009 Aug 17 00:37:22  <inimino> next?
2009 Aug 17 00:37:36  <aamar> 3.45 ?
2009 Aug 17 00:37:41  <inimino> http://inimino.org/~inimino/projects/2009/SICP/chap_3/3.45
2009 Aug 17 00:37:59  <aamar> http://pasternak.superalloy.nl/pastes/2630
2009 Aug 17 00:38:30  <aamar> oh, yours is 3.46
2009 Aug 17 00:38:37  <inimino> erm...
2009 Aug 17 00:38:38  <inimino> yeah
2009 Aug 17 00:38:49  <inimino> I seem to have answered the wrong question
2009 Aug 17 00:39:43  <inimino> ah, I inadvertenly skipped over 3.45
2009 Aug 17 00:39:52  <inimino> inadvertently, even
2009 Aug 17 00:40:01  <aamar> Yes, here's my 3.46 for the record
2009 Aug 17 00:40:07  <aamar> http://pasternak.superalloy.nl/pastes/2631
2009 Aug 17 00:40:20  <inimino> your answer to 3.45 seems to me to be correct
2009 Aug 17 00:40:31  <aamar> the same answer as yours
2009 Aug 17 00:40:52  <inimino> yep
2009 Aug 17 00:41:39  <aamar> ok
2009 Aug 17 00:41:42  <aamar> 3.47 ?
2009 Aug 17 00:41:47  <inimino> that's as far as I got
2009 Aug 17 00:41:50  <aamar> oh this one I skipped
2009 Aug 17 00:42:24  <aamar> ok gives me a chance to finish this.
2009 Aug 17 00:42:41  <inimino> alright
2009 Aug 17 00:42:53  <aamar> actually I think 3.47 - 3.49 are probably the most interesting exercises in this sectino
2009 Aug 17 00:43:28  <inimino> yeah I wouldn't be surprised
2009 Aug 17 00:44:43  <inimino> alright, should we review those last three next time and also push on into 3.5?
2009 Aug 17 00:45:49  <aamar> yes, I think we should do that
2009 Aug 17 00:45:54  -*- aamar scans ahead
2009 Aug 17 00:46:59  <inimino> alright
2009 Aug 17 00:47:09  <aamar> could do through 3.62 or 3.76
2009 Aug 17 00:47:47  <aamar> 3.72 is another possible stopping point
2009 Aug 17 00:48:39  <inimino> 3.72 looks good from a quick scan
2009 Aug 17 00:48:57  <aamar> sounds good
2009 Aug 17 00:49:15  <inimino> alright, great
2009 Aug 17 00:49:37  <inimino> that'll be the 30th, then
2009 Aug 17 00:52:28  <inimino> alright, see you then :)
2009 Aug 17 00:58:48  <aamar> see you then!